You wrote this entire thing for me to have to disagree with you. Verification after all legal copies have been accounted for IS damaging unnecessarily. When the letter of the law has extenuating circumstances that invalidate it, it no longer supports the spirit of the law and therefore becomes unnecessary and quite useless, it can even be damaging. This is one such case." The letter of the law is designed to support the spirit of the law. I'll repeat my opening statement, "Sometimes people give too much power to the letter of the law as opposed to the spirit of the law. In fact, additional verification only possibly gives the opposing player an unnecessary advantage. Does logic or fair play mandate any additional verification after all legal copies have been accounted for? No, it does not. Third, realize that it is not illegal to reveal a card(s) in one's hand to the opponent. (Personally I'd argue that any further time spent on the verification process after all legal copies are accounted for consitutes Slow Play-Warning at the least and could go or UC-Cheating if the player is trying to gain additional knowledge of the opponent's deck after verifying all legal copies) Second, realize with the above paragraph in mind, as soon as verification is complete to a point where players have identified all legal copies OR the absence of any additional copies, the verification process is complete. This is one such case.įirst realize that verification is not part of the EFFECT of Nobleman of Crossout, verification is only done to ensure that an illegal game state does not develop on the part of both players at a future point in the game. Sometimes people give too much power to the letter of the law as opposed to the spirit of the law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |